Call for papers

Two sides of the same coin? Exploring the relationship between archival research and practice

A special issue of Archives & Manuscripts from the Australian Society of Archivists’ Research and Education Special Interest Group, edited by Dr Mike Jones (REDSIG Convenor/University of Tasmania) and Rachel Tropea (RMIT University).

Expressions of interest due 4 August 2023.

Full articles/contributions due 20 October 2023.

“In the end, whether theory and method are closely aligned and actualized in practice will depend not on the power of the theory, but on the power of individuals, professional organizations, and institutions.”

Heather MacNeil, ‘Archival Theory and Practice: Between Two Paradigms’, Archivaria, 1994.

“In theory, there is no difference between theory and practice. But in practice, there is.”

Benjamin Brewster, 1882

Since the mid-twentieth century, Australia has been widely recognised for innovative approaches to the practice and theory of archives and records, from the Australian Series System to the Records Continuum Model. But the relationship between archival work, records management, and contemporary theory and research is not always clear, nor is it unproblematic. Some archivists engage in long-standing theoretical discussions about the nature of records, evidence, and provenance, or try to apply concepts like continuum theory and radical empathy in their professional roles. Others struggle to see the relevance of research methods, abstract models, or theoretical debates to their daily work.

For this special issue of Archives & Manuscripts, from the ASA’s Research and Education Special Interest Group (REDSIG), we are seeking papers that explore the interface between research and practice in Australia, including: the challenges and rewards for practitioners in engaging with and applying research in their work; the value (and accompanying difficulties) for researchers when seeking to demonstrate and develop the practical implications of their research; and the complex relationship between the two that characterises the archival profession and archival education.

We strongly encourage pieces from practitioners (including first time contributors to Archives & Manuscripts), and articles co-developed with practitioners, education staff, institutional representatives, and community collaborators. Preference will be given to these pieces over and above proposals authored solely by recognised researchers.

Submissions should be sent via email to: mjones@archivists.org.au 

We are seeking diverse papers and contributions in a variety of formats including:

  • Peer-reviewed articles (up to 10,000 words)
  • Reflection articles (up to 3,000 words)
  • Short video presentations, debates, or conversations
  • Short recorded interviews (audio or video)

Some of the questions you might consider exploring include:

  • What is the value of research in the contemporary Australian archival profession?
  • How valuable is contemporary archival research and theory to archival practitioners currently working in the field?
  • What challenges or barriers do practitioners face when trying to engage with existing or new archival research?
  • Do archival employers support their employees in engaging with and applying relevant research findings?
  • What challenges do researchers face when trying to engage practitioners, organisations, and institutions with their work?
  • How does institutional context shape the relationship between research and practice for those involved with national/state archives; collecting archives; community archives; school archives; or corporate archives?
  • Do particular modes and methods of research—e.g. quantitative and qualitative surveys, action research, community co-creation, historical surveys, transnational comparisons—change the relationship with practice in productive ways?
  • How do institutional requirements (for archivists and records managers, or for researchers) constrain the ability of practitioners and researchers to work effectively together?
  • How should educators balance theoretical knowledge, research capability, and practical skills when teaching archives and records management students?
  • Does the ASA do enough to foster relationships between researchers and practitioners through its initiatives and programs, in publications like Archives & Manuscripts, or at major events like the ASA conference?
  • What can researchers, universities, archival institutions, and associations like the ASA do better to encourage more productive relationships between research and practice within the profession?

Author guidelines for peer-reviewed articles and reflection articles are available from Archives & Manuscripts (https://publications.archivists.org.au/index.php/asa/guidelines). If you would like further advice on any of these contribution types, or if you have opinions on the questions above but are not sure about the best way of expressing them, please feel free to contact the editors via Mike Jones (mjones@archivists.org.au).

Some authors of peer reviewed articles will be invited to contribute to the peer review process for the issue and are encouraged (though not obliged) to participate. Peer reviewed articles will also receive comments from at least one external reviewer. All contributions (including peer reviewed articles) will receive editorial comments from the editors.

The guest editors for this issue are Dr Mike Jones (REDSIG Convenor/University of Tasmania) and Rachel Tropea (RMIT University). Mike and Rachel have both worked at the interface between research and practice for their whole careers, including while working together at the University of Melbourne’s eScholarship Research Centre (ESRC). Mike left the ESRC to complete his PhD, and has since worked at the Australian National University and the University of Tasmania. Though his main focus is now research, he continues to provide advice, consultancy, and support to GLAM sector practitioners in a variety of contexts. Rachel moved from research and project management roles at the ESRC into management positions, including at the University of Melbourne Archives, and now as Senior Coordinator, RMIT University Archives. Though her main focus is now practice, she continues to engage with and apply contemporary research findings and methods in her work.

Key dates

4 August 2023 Submit response to call for papers, including short (100 word) biographies of all contributors, and:

  • Peer-reviewed article—abstract (500 words)
  • Reflection article—abstract/short summary (200 words)
  • Short video—summary paragraph (200 words)
  • Short recorded interviews—summary paragraph (200 words)

11 August 2023 Contributors notified

20 October 2023 Full articles/contributions due

15 December 2023 Peer reviews and editorial comments returned to all contributors

5 February 2024 Final articles/contributions due

February/March Special issue published